[Gasification] Fwd: RE: Whole log pyrolysis for char production was Re: W...
GFWHELL at aol.com
GFWHELL at aol.com
Fri Jan 3 00:05:51 CST 2014
Regarding the reflected heat from the refractory: If you were to travel on
the footplate of a steam locomotive at full regulator, you might observe a
temperature of 2,500 f in the fire box. in which there is generally a
refractory (brick) arch above the grate which extends the flame pattern and
generally helps the secondary air entering above the grate to insure compete
combustion. I have observed these arches to glow bight Yellow, the surface
of the brickwork actually melting with the heat. I am certain the
radiation has a lot to do with complete combustion. Would this form of radiation
help refine "smoke" (gas) breaking it down into short chain Molecules?
GF
In a message dated 1/2/2014 3:35:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rex at whitfieldfarm.co.za writes:
Paul,
I designed a diesel burner for preheating a bubbling fluidised combustor
about 12 years ago. Fortunately I took advice from an old and experienced
engineer who advised that we had to line the fire box with refractory. When
questioned why, his explanation was as follows: the diesel burns and gives
off radiant heat to the wall. The wall heats up and radiates heat back
toward the flame. The incoming radiation from the refractory is what evaporates
and heats the diesel so that it is able to burn nearly completely (as
opposed to the smoky start when the refractory is cold). I suspect that Rolf’s
refractory does much the same thing in that it sends radiation back into the
log. This heating effect is frequently underestimated as to its assistance
with the whole combustion process. We also use this effect in the first
portion of wall above the bubbling fluid bed level to provide radiation into
the secondary air combustion area. Above this we build a membrane wet wall
boiler. As with Rolf, our secondary air is aimed downward as we run the
bubbling bed under a slight vacuum.
I am looking forward to seeing Rolf’s photos.
Rex
From: Paul Anderson [mailto:psanders at ilstu.edu]
Sent: 27 December 2013 04:49 PM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification;
biochar at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Gasification] Fwd: RE: Whole log pyrolysis for char production
was Re: Wood heating in the UK - whole log gasification
Dear all,
This excellent reply below came from Rolf. Thank you!!
Pictures only after 6 January, but by then I am in Africa and might not
remember to request that Rolf send them. Together, we should be able to get
this worked out.
We definitely should have some other people replicating this and
suggesting solutions for char removal, etc. And there should be some examination
of the pyrolyzed log concerning the char in the center verses the char at
the edges, and % yield (by weight).
Paul
Doc / Dr TLUD / Prof. Paul S. Anderson, PhD
Email: _psanders at ilstu.edu_ (mailto:psanders at ilstu.edu)
Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: _www.drtlud.com_ (http://www.drtlud.com/)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
RE: Whole log pyrolysis for char production was Re: [Gasification] Wood
heating in the UK - whole log gasification
Date:
Fri, 27 Dec 2013 08:50:06 +0100
From:
energiesnaturals _<energiesnaturals at gmx.de>_
(mailto:energiesnaturals at gmx.de)
Reply-To:
energiesnaturals _<energiesnaturals at gmx.de>_
(mailto:energiesnaturals at gmx.de)
To:
_psanders at ilstu.edu_ (mailto:psanders at ilstu.edu)
Hallo Paul,
Thanks for your interest in our living room stove/boiler!
Because that's what it is.
I build this one and quite a few more many years ago in the pre pellet
area.
It is not really a big thing but just what i said in my 1. Description for
Ken.
An airtight firebox with controlled primary and secondary air, both
preheated by the non insulated air and water xchanger above the burning chamber.
The primary 60% is used to regulate the gasification ( remember it is an
all night heater on one log) and the secondary actually burns the
develloping gas.
The escape hole is central in the dome. The admission pipes of 2.air are
offset and aimed at a 30 deg.downwards to create a turbulance and thus allow
for a quite complete combustion before the gas leaves the hot area. We use
mainly white pine, p.halepensis, airdried or so-so and we clean the
conducts every 2. year or so, it burns so clean.
After 1-3 h, depending on the log, you can find the remaining carbon in
more or less the shape of the log.
We do not use the char at present, cause it would be a mess to take it out
inside the living room...,but if we put in the last log around midnight
and close all the 1. And most of the 2nd air once it is lit, we are left with
a good bed of embers for toasting our breakfast bread.
If our aim was to produce char , i should have incorporated a movable
floor( no grate) to discharge it into a cooling device below or yes a grate and
create a repeating cycle without the need to light the batch every time.
(Un-)luckily i cannot provide any pictures right now, because we spend a
wonderful holydays at our doughter's in Budapest.
But if you want some, tell me after the 6th next year.
B.r.
Rolf
Paul Anderson _<psanders at ilstu.edu>_ (mailto:psanders at ilstu.edu)
escribió:
Dear Rolf, (and hello to Greg!!)
I am very interested in your method of whole log gasification. In
particular, I am interested in your statement that the pyrolysis occurs first
(or mostly first is fine), leaving the char to either be consumed (char
gasified) or removed. My interest is in removing / saving the char for a
variety of other purposes, including possible use as biochar. (I am interested
in using the heat, but that can be treated as a separate topic.)
Therefore, I am sending this message to the Biochar Listserv. But
because relatively few people subscribe to both lists, I (and Ron Larson and Tom
Miles) will relay your reply to the Biochar List. Eventually these
messages could be taken off of the Gasification List and just continued with the
Biochar list, but let's see what develops.
Could you please provide some:
some photos,
construction plans if available,
and some data on what percentage of char is yielded from the dry weight of
the feedstock logs.
I am content with using cordwood that is smaller than the 45 cm diameter
that you mention, so any comments about the good or bad of using 10 cm or 25
cm diameter feedstock would be appreciated.
Although as you say it is "a tad late", I will count your message and
replies among my most treasured presents received this year for Christmas!!
Paul
Doc / Dr TLUD / Prof. Paul S. Anderson, PhD
Email: _psanders at ilstu.edu_ (mailto:psanders at ilstu.edu)
Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: _www.drtlud.com_ (http://www.drtlud.com/)
On 12/26/2013 5:16 PM, energiesnaturals wrote:
Merry Christmas Ken and list ( I am aware that I am a tad late)
One way to burn whole logs like we do (45cm across x 55 cm long) in an
efficient way is to build a well closed ,dome shaped burning chamber out of 15
cm fire brick and have individually regulated, preheated primary and
2,dary air , at least 2 pipes either side.
You build up afire with kindling as you describe it and after 15 min you
can add an entire log of pitchy pine and it will first gasify very nicely
and than burn the charcoal if you want.
The secret is to keep the walls of the combustion chamber warm and do not
use them as heat xchangers!
You build a convenient xchanger above it and use the hot exhaust gas.
Build it large enough to reduce the exhaust temp to 90 deg C or less and you
will be way above 50 % eff. Ours has been working for 20+ years and is still
doing fine with 2 mm black steel pipes.
We never cut anything below 55 cm long and never split anything below 45
cm, believe me or come and see!
Cheers and a happy new year
Rolf
Enviado desde Samsung tablet
Ken Boak _<ken.boak at gmail.com>_ (mailto:ken.boak at gmail.com) escribió:
Greg
Thanks for sharing.
I want to try a few ideas for myself to see if this is indeed possible on
the small split logs I can produce locally.
Our heating needs, and indeed modest on account of the mild climate here,
but I would like to find an efficient solution for all the thousands of
acres of neglected coppiced hardwood. Cast iron victorian stoves may be
quaint, but I am sure there are ways to improve the overall efficiency with
radical redesign.
The main burner/heat exchanger on our 24kW gas boiler is no bigger than a
gallon paint tin. Perhaps there is design lesson to be learned here
Anything to reduce mechanical handling and processing of wood fuels has to
be a step in the right direction
Happy New Year
Ken
On 26 December 2013 19:22, Greg Manning <_a31ford at gmail.com_
(mailto:a31ford at gmail.com) > wrote:
Greetings Ken, and list members.
Ken, I'm going to point you to a video of the "underside" of a whole log
(or split) "cordwood as we call it here" stove that is a downdraft gasifier.
I can speak at length privately, however only somewhat on list, as this is
a proprietary design.
Here's the link to the video:
http://youtu.be/DNYCfgEdYpg
Greg Manning
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Ken Boak <_ken.boak at gmail.com_
(mailto:ken.boak at gmail.com) > wrote:
Happy Christmas to the gasification list.
At this time of year, during the festive holiday season, I get a bit more
time to manage the running of our woodstove, as it rapidly warms the room
and produces a cheery effect.
Our property is fairly conventionally heated by natural gas, but a few
years back, I took the decision to invest in a woodstove with back-boiler, to
provide an alternative or back-up to the gas fired system.
The woodstove has a flat steel tank at the rear, the "back boilerr", in
place of a couple of the firebricks lining. This circulates heated water
entirely by the thermosyphon principle to a radiator located in the
bedroom/workroom directly above the stove. So in effect the stove heats the living
room/kitchen area directly, and the room upstairs by circulating hot water.
No electricity is required for circulation, and if worse-case we had an
extended power outage, this stove would provide heat and comfort in the two
main occupied areas of the house. Stoking it and attending it is often more
interesting than what is being shown on TV!
With a few days off work, I have had time to monitor the stove and make
some assessments of its overall performance. Its a fairly traditional stove,
a rectangular box,, made from bolted together cast iron panels and partly
lined with firebrick. It's described as a multifuel stove - having been
supplied with a cast iron removable grate for burning coal - which is not used
when burning wood. It's approximately 24" wide, 12" deep and 18" tall.
In the UK, a common size for firewood logs, intended for the domestic
woodstove is about 10" (254mm) long, and equal to a 1/4 round taken from a limb
that may have been 5 or 6" in diameter. The reason for this is that there
is a lot of coppiced hardwood, which has become mis-managed in the last 20
years, so there are a lot of trees with 6" diameter shoots. The
popularity of the "firewood processor" machine, means that a lot of this wood is now
coming on the market as domestic firewood, and sold to suburbanites at
vastly inflated prices (about $0.50 per kilo).
I am burning a mixture of kiln dried Silver Birch, and air dried other
species which includes ash, oak and sweet chestnut. The silver birch splits
well and makes excellent kindling. One log is split into 8 or 10 kindling
sticks and these are built into a pyramid around 2 or 3 sheets of scrunched
up newspaper. Lighting is quick and easy - as the birch is kiln dried, and
within 5 minutes you will have a roaring fire and the larger logs can be
added.
The logs have an average weight of approximately 1 kg. I have found that a
normal burn rate of these is two per hour. I burn two at a time, and each
hour, add a further two to the burning char bed from the previous logs.
With firewood having a calorific value of approximately 4kWh/kg - I estimate
the fuel input is in the order of 8 to 10kW.
Of course, with a traditional stove, so much of the heat energy is lost up
the chimney, and goes to create the draft. The efficiency of the stove,
might be in the region of 50% - somewhat better than the open wood fire. It
occurred to me that by way of a 2 stage gasification process, it would be
possible to increase the overall system efficiency, resulting in less wood
consumption, or more heat output per log.
This leads to a question - is it possible to design a gasifier aimed at
handling whole log gasification - where a log is 10" long and no more than 6"
across? Can you recreate the temperatures, turbulence and reactants,
found within the combustion zone of the woodstove, and use this to thermally
process a single firewood log, at the rate of one every 30 minutes or so?
I've had some ideas on how this can be done, effectively using a length of
6" diameter stovepipe/fluepipe to make a compact gasifier. Logs would be
loaded in from the top, and the length of the pipe chosen to perhaps hold 4
logs at any time - about 1m (40") tall. The bottom log would sit in the
combustion zone - so the end of this log is constantly under the action of
the air nozzles. The logs above are subjected to the elevated temperatures
and begin to pyrolise, char and split on their descent down the tube.
Beneath the combustion zone would be a fairly conventional hearth, and
reduction zone, with the char supported by a grate below that. For an overall
idea of the system - think of HS Mukundas open top gasifier.
Use of twin-wall stainless flue pipe would allow the air to be pre-heated
in the outer annulus - adding to the overall efficiency. The hot syn-gas
could be burned in whatever appropriate burner geometry deemed necessary for
either radiant space heating or water heating with a suitable heat
exchanger coil.
I hope to try to build a prototype of this over the next 10 days (a
working gasification holiday?) and to see whether a log can be reduced in this
manner. If all that is needed is heat, then the restrictions to produce a
tar free gas need not apply. If one can use whole logs, without having to
resort to woodchip - then this will be a considerable saving in mechanical
handling and wood processing.
At the end of the day - this gasifying stove needs to be as simple to
operate as the existing woodstove. Reloading with a couple of logs each hour,
and no sophisticated need for fan- forced draft or electricity to operate.
Draft would come from the chimney as per now - about 25 to 30 feet, 6"
diameter.
If anyone has experience of something similar - please let me know.
Happy Holidays
Ken
____________________________________
(http://www.avast.com/)
This email is free from viruses and malware because _avast! Antivirus_
(http://www.avast.com/) protection is active.
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Gasification at bioenergylists.org
to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenerg
ylists.org
for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20140103/d6259209/attachment.html>
More information about the Gasification
mailing list