[Greenbuilding] NYC 90% emissions cut with windows
Michael Iversen
miversen at uic.edu
Wed Mar 20 11:53:37 CDT 2013
I reviewed the '90 by 50' report, and its conclusions are based on
invalid assumptions, extrapolations and projections placed outside the
context of reality in terms of economic and social behavior. Basically,
the report concludes that IF ALL buildings in NYC were retrofitted or
designed with rigorous energy measures, and IF ALL buildings were
equipped with rooftop photovoltaic systems, and IF ALL source energy was
carbon-free electricity, then a 90 percent reduction in building
sector-related GHG emissions is possible by 2050.
*Report Assumption 1*: All building stock is assumed to be retrofitted /
designed with existing and near-term efficiency technologies,
specifically; air sealing, heat recovery ventilation, and additional
insulation, to a point where all heating, cooling, and hot water can be
provided by electric heat pumps. Capital outlays are estimated at a
discounted net present value $94 billion.
- /Comment/: While energy retrofitting of existing building stock is a
valid strategy to reduce GHG, the projection of findings based on
perfect model simulations for each building type to the entire building
stock is extremely unrealistic, in terms of financial costs and building
ownership / management behavior. The $94 billion costs need to be placed
in the context of local, state, and federal economic deficits. The
report needs to project the extent of retrofitting based on historic
data, not unrealistic goals.
*Report Assumption 2*: All remaining building loads to be carbon-free
electricity. After reducing total building energy use by 50 to 60
percent, all remaining building energy in 2050 (50.6 TWh) is to be
supplied by carbon-free electricity, in order to meet the 90 percent
reduction target.
Photovoltaic arrays may be added to every single building in NYC
(covering up to 60 percent of the available rooftop area), so as to
provide 10.7 TWh.
The report enumerates potential sources of adequate carbon-free
electricity, but states that a detailed analysis is beyond the scope of
this study. Besides the previously mentioned electricity from
photovoltaics (10.7 TWh), the remaining 39.9 TWh are to be provided a)
2,600 4.0MW wind turbines, occupying 35 to 40 square miles, b) an
additional 86 million square meters of photovoltaic panels with a
footprint of 66 square miles, c) 3 or 4 new 1000 MW nuclear power
plants, d) increased hydropower from Quebec, and e) electricity
generation from biogas derived from waste and sewage treatment.
- /Comment:/ To assume 100% of buildings will be retrofitted with pv
arrays covering 60% of roof area is an unsubstantiated overestimate, and
does not factor building structural capacity, financial capacity, and
social behavior of private building ownership / management.
- /Comment:/ To simply assume that 39.9 -- 50.6 (TWh) of source energy
is to carbon free is equivalent to saying it will be provided by magic
beans. Any proposed strategy would be valid of all remaining source
energy would be carbon free.
*Summary*: if anything, this report points to how difficult it is to
achieve a 90 percent reduction of GHG emissions related to the building
sector by 2050. While some of the data findings were of value and
interest, any interpretation of findings, unless grounded in the
relatity of economic and social behavior, will provide only false
conclusions.
I welcome other viewpoints on this study.
Michael Iversen
Architect, LEED AP, PhD Candidate
Department of Urban Planning and Policy
University of Illinois at Chicago
> ______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20130320/a71e79e9/attachment.html>
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list