[Stoves] Biochar definitely into compost as a host to microbiology but as animal feed?
Gerrie Baker
gbaker at rideau.net
Fri Nov 4 10:00:45 CDT 2011
Hello Kevin: This seems quite odd to me. I would not expect animals to
want to ingest char however I shall add a few chunks into the chicken
pen and watch for the results. I would not expect the char to act like
oyster shell or grit in the crop but to be honest I do not know so I
shall observe and I have one rooster isolated for the next family dinner
so I can feed some into his pen and if he ingests it I will examine the
crop when he is killed to see how it "looks" compared to the stones and
grain normally seen. Regards, Gerrie
Regards, Gerrie Baker, aka The Worm Lady
Dedicated to delivering organic waste solutions through education and demonstrations of worm composting habitats indoors and outside. Focused on converting garbage to gardens and encouraging people to grow their own healthy nutritious food and beautiful edible flowers.
The Worm Factory
874 Grady Road, Foley Mountain
Westport, ON K0G 1X0
613-273-7595
www.thewormfactory.ca
On 31/10/2011 7:44 PM, Kevin wrote:
> Dear Tom
> Given that biochar seems to be a good addition to manure and compost,
> what about purposely adding it to food scraps intended for animal
> feed, for the medicinal benefit that ingested charcoal may provide?
> 1: Is there any known detrimental effect to animals consuming charcoal?
> 2: Is there any reason to believe that animals would find charcoal
> fines in their food as unpalatable?
> 3: Would chickens perhaps seek out charcoal particles as a "grit
> substitute?"
> If nothing else, at least manure from animals fed charcoal would
> produce "pre-biocharred manure." :-)
> Best wishes,
> Kevin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Tom Miles <mailto:tmiles at trmiles.com>
> *To:* 'Discussion of biomass cooking stoves'
> <mailto:stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 6:17 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] [biochar-production] Re: Stoves Digest,
> Vol 14,Issue 17
>
> Frank,
>
> I can understand that carbon in different forms degrades at
> different rates. And dry AD systems are interesting.
>
> When I add char to household food scraps it makes what appears to
> be a better quality of compost. I am also aware that In the
> developing world these same scraps might be used as feed. Maybe
> Paul, Art, or others have had experience with adding TLUD char to
> compost from food waste, litter, or manure.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
> *From:*stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org
> [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Frank Shields
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 1:45 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion of biomass cooking stoves'
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] [biochar-production] Re: Stoves Digest,
> Vol 14, Issue 17
>
> Tom,
>
> The C/N ratio is almost useless in when preparing compost
> formulations contrary to what most people think. The carbon is
> determined on a Total Carbon and so is nitrogen. What we really
> need is available C and N and the availability changes during the
> composting process. If you add wood chips to a compost they will
> be there in a large part when the compost is finished -- so should
> not be counted. Oils and other lipids will biodegrade quickly
> lowering the pH. Then it's the slow release of carbon to available
> form as the process continues. With nitrogen becoming available as
> ammonia the pH goes up. It can out-gas and be lost so availability
> of nitrogen should also be a continuous process. All this occurs
> with in vegetative material that has wood chips added only for
> porosity.
>
> So a measure of total N and total C at the beginning has little
> use and is only a guideline. Real way is to measure the Total N
> and C at the beginning and again at the end to determine the C
> removed as CO2 IMO. But to answer your question you might as well
> test for Total N and total C to get a C/N ratio with the char
> along with the wood chips.
>
> As for food scraps; They are the hardest to compost unless well
> mixed in with a lot of other materials. That because they are
> readily available C and N and react fast and that causes smells
> and fluctuation in pH, hugh oxygen demands making anaerobic
> conditions etc. New interest is AD dry systems then aerobic
> composting remaining material that have been partial stabilized.
>
> Frank
>
> *From:*stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org
> [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Tom Miles
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 1:01 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion of biomass cooking stoves'
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] [biochar-production] Re: Stoves Digest,
> Vol 14, Issue 17
>
> Frank
>
> If I am taking char from a TLUD and adding it to cooking scraps
> for compost do I ignore the carbon in the char when calculating
> the Carbon to Nitrogen ratio?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Tom
>
> *From:*stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org
> <mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]
> <mailto:[mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]> *On
> Behalf Of *Frank Shields
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 12:05 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion of biomass cooking stoves'
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] [biochar-production] Re: Stoves Digest,
> Vol 14, Issue 17
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> For compost the purpose is to 'stabilize' the carbon to a point
> the environment can replenish oxygen and nutrients at a rate
> plants and biota is not effected. When in an ag situation we have
> growers ready to supplement nutrients (nitrogen) at the ready when
> plants or lab tests indicate needed. Stabilized values I like to
> see is < 4 mg CO2-C / g organic matter / day. This dry weight.
> But many people use 8 mg CO2-C as a stabilized value.
>
> I think biochar is not even in the picture for nitrogen up-take or
> oxygen depletion in an ag soil because they will be so low.
> Perhaps over time in a non ag environment the carbon may deplete
> the nitrogen - put more likely just hold the nitrogen from being
> leached for later use.
>
> Frank
>
> *From:*stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org
> <mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]
> <mailto:[mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]> *On
> Behalf Of *Tom Miles
> *Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2011 11:50 AM
> *To:* 'Discussion of biomass cooking stoves'
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] [biochar-production] Re: Stoves Digest,
> Vol 14, Issue 17
>
> Crispin, Frank,
>
> Apart from fraud, it is nice to have a general indication of how
> much of the fuel will convert to a gas before burning and how much
> would, in theory, remain as char. IN practice you oxidize part of
> he "fixed" carbon as well.
>
> In carbonization the volatile carbon is a useful indicator of the
> extent of carbonization. We look for volatile carbon to be less
> than 20% for most applications. That does not mean that all
> biochar needs to be less than 20% volatile carbon. Other measures
> of labile carbon would be helpful.
>
> For biochar applications it would be useful to know how much of
> the carbon is likely to be consumed by organisms and will thereby
> have a demand on nitrogen or other nutrients. I have assumes that
> is the volatile fraction. How much char C do you include in
> calculating a C:N ration for composting, for example? If you
> intend to deliver a char to a uses that will supply it's own N how
> much to you have to add? How much char from stoves can you
> estimate will have a demand on plant nutrients if used as biochar?
>
> Tom
>
> *From:*stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org
> <mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]
> <mailto:[mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]> *On
> Behalf Of *Crispin Pemberton-Pigott
> *Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2011 1:09 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion of biomass cooking stoves'
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] [biochar-production] Re: Stoves Digest,
> Vol 14, Issue 17
>
> Dear Frank
>
> My main disagreement is the term Fixed Carbon and that it means
> the total weigh DAF where it should be a measure of carbon in that
> fraction. I will need to get over that.
>
> I assure you that Fixed Carbon does not have a clear and
> scientific meaning. I have given up hope with analyses that use
> the term. That means, it is 'helpful' but not an exact measure of
> anything.
>
> It really is taken to mean the carbon that happens not to
> disappear when the sample is treated in a certain way. Treat it in
> another way and the 'fixed' portion changes so it is an inherent
> property of the protocol times the fuel, not a property of the
> fuel alone.
>
> The coal industry is so large that they feel they can get away
> with internal definitions and that makes huge problems for stovers
> because we never really know what we are being handed to burn.
> With biomass that has historically been the 'chemistry' of the
> fuel contents. But the principal users of 'fixed carbon' are the
> coal consumers like power stations. To give the DAF value of
> anything is misleading because we need to know what % it is of the
> fuel, not of part of the fuel.
>
> There are many tricks played by people promoting processed fuels
> that involve switching the fuel energy content numbers during the
> conversation. For example, people will report the 'as received'
> heat content as the fuel's heating value (which is true) and then
> point out that their 'Processing' increases this to a much higher
> 'DAF value' showing a '60% increase in energy per kg' even though
> it takes energy to remove the water and calculate out the ash.
> Plain fraud. Whenever someone reports the energy content you have
> to not only ask on what basis the figure was derived, but also
> investigate the protocol to see if it really is what it claims to
> be. Many people believe that there is free energy to be harvested
> in this manner.
>
> Regards
>
> Crispin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web
> site:
> http://www.bioenergylists.org/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2012.0.1834 / Virus Database: 2092/4587 - Release Date:
> 10/31/11
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
> http://www.bioenergylists.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20111104/8a06caf6/attachment.html>
More information about the Stoves
mailing list