[Stoves] A doctoral thesis on stoves

Crispin Pemberton-Pigott crispinpigott at gmail.com
Sun Sep 22 01:39:41 CDT 2013


Dear Lanny

 

With the School Lunch Cooker I let the burner extend 1"/25mm above the cook
top and used 2"/50mm tall pot holders. This puts the heat on the pot and
shields the stove top with a layer of dead air.

 

I have another interpretation that may be useful. You did the right thing,
but the layer of air is not at all dead. What happens is that the buoyancy
of the hot molecules is much stronger than the effect of turbulence. Even
though the gap under the pot is large, it is not hot 'down there' on the
lower surface. The heat rapidly rises into the pot. An implementation that
most will find useful is to extend the burner higher than the top deck as
you have done, then have the larger gap, then put a ring of similar height
(a little higher) at about the OD of the pot. 

 

This creates a heat transfer zone that is not easily blown around by
transient winds.

 

The suggestion that the space should be small with a high velocity to bring
the heat close to the pot is based on the presumption that the hottest
molecules do not rise with more force than the turbulent force. In fact the
buoyancy force is about 30 times the turbulent force. The heat is always at
the top when the flow is in the 200 mm/sec range. "Top" in this case means
the top 2mm of the cross section. It is cool right at the surface where the
heat flux is taking place.

 

The suggestion that 'more heat' gets into the pot if the velocity is high
confuses the heat transfer rate with the heat transfer efficiency. They are
both efficiencies (ratios) but of different things.

 

Regards

Crispin

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20130922/e31662c3/attachment.html>


More information about the Stoves mailing list