[Stoves] China and cookstoves [Was Re: A user-centered, iterative engineering approach for advanced biomass cookstove design and development]
Nikhil Desai
pienergy2008 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 1 17:50:19 CST 2017
Paul:
Capital cost of the stove is a minor issue; the question is whether the
users like and use the stove. This is why contextual definitions matter,
because pellet production costs can vary greatly depending on the
feedstock.
A high capital cost stove can be given one-time subsidy - should be given
to the distributor if one exists; could be given to a bulk producer - on
the condition that the stoves are found useful and used. Metrics of
efficiency and hourly emission rates are just smoke.
I am glad to read "it is something about family, a cultural thing,
especially in country side." Gives the lie to physics-only theories of
supposed "stove science".
Nikhil
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Paul Anderson <psanders at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> Cheng and all, (and a mention of Todd Albi). see below.
>
> Doc / Dr TLUD / Prof. Paul S. Anderson, PhD
> Email: psanders at ilstu.edu
> Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072 <(309)%20452-7072>
> Website: www.drtlud.com
>
> On 11/29/2017 10:15 PM, lh cheng wrote:
>
> Another Chinese little project. Surely, it is cookstove, not heater. Too
> expensive, 1500RMB (230 USD), in rural area, a big number, very big, no one
> buy, not even one, in rural area. For user, many uncertainties to use new
> type of stove. if free of charge, a trustworthy friend who is an expert
> about this stove, that might be fine.
>
> I was wondering about the price of that pellet burner stove. Yes, it is
> expensive, but expensive is a relative term. It could be imported into
> America where $230 is inexpensive, but the price here would be so much
> higher and it would then be expensive here.
>
>
> stove thing should be open-source ( just like Dr Anderson's Champion Stove
> ), DIY, or made by acquaintance, it is something about family, a cultural
> thing, especially in country side. In city, electricity or LPG is enough.
>
> Is there any prospect in China for DIY. And what would be the acceptance
> of a stove made with thin metal? Generalizing, it seems that heavy
> construction of stoves is the standard in China. Todd Albi might be able
> to shed some light on this.
>
>
> a good approach for stove design maybe is that, basic knowledge of stove
> design spread among people, and people help each other.
>
> What do you have in mind? in the context of China? I have difficulty
> imagining stove design work in China outside of the factory context.
>
>
> concerning "stove intervention", during 1959-1961 in China, more than 30
> millions of people died because a stove intervention movement. and people
> have memories.
>
> Please provide more information about this statement about 30 million
> deaths.
>
> Welcome to the world of the Stoves Listserv. We appreciate your insights.
>
> Paul
>
>
> best regards
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20171201/4ea98ff7/attachment.html>
More information about the Stoves
mailing list